NASA
Backs Away From Foam Damage Theory
By MARCIA DUNN, AP Aerospace Writer
SPACE CENTER, Houston - After days of analysis, NASA (news
- web
sites) backed away Wednesday from the theory that a piece of foam that
struck Columbia during liftoff was the root cause of the space shuttle's
disintegration over Texas.
Shuttle
program manager Ron Dittemore said investigators now are focusing more closely
on the desperate effort of Columbia's automatic control system to hold the speed of the
spacecraft stable despite an increasing level of wind resistance, or drag, on
the left wing.
Dittemore
said that after a careful study of the damage possible from the fall of a chunk
of foam insulation that was believed to be 20 inches and 2 1/2 pounds,
investigators are "looking somewhere else."
"Right
now, it just does not make sense to us that a piece of debris would be the root
cause for the loss of Columbia and its crew," he said. "There's got
to be another reason."
Dittemore
said investigators are now asking if there was "another event that escaped
our attention" that might have caused Columbia to break up just minutes before the end of its
16-day mission, killing all seven astronauts.
Practically from the
start, investigators have been looking at the possibility that the piece of
foam that fell off the shuttle's big external fuel tank 81 seconds after
liftoff Jan. 16 caused damage to the thermal tiles under the left wing that
doomed the flight. The thermal tiles keep the ship from burning up during
re-entry into Earth's atmosphere.
While
Columbia was still aloft, NASA engineers analyzed the potential damage to the
thermal tiles and concluded that based on such factors as the estimated size,
weight and trajectory of the chunk of foam, any damage to the tiles was minor
and the crew was in no danger.
Dittemore
said the engineers in their study doubled the relative velocity of the foam and
shuttle, from the actual 513 mph to 1,026 mph, and were conservative in
estimating the weight of the debris.
"We're looking
somewhere else," he said. "Was there another event that escaped
detection?"
In recent days, some
space experts have speculated that the chunk of foam was coated or infused with
ice, which could have increased the weight — and destructive potential
— of the piece that hit the shuttle.
"I
don't think it's ice. I don't think there's an embedded ice question
here," Dittemore said, adding that the foam is water-resistant and that an
inspection team found no ice conditions that day. "So it is something
else."
Dittemore said that
during Columbia's final minutes, the autopilot was causing the craft to rapidly
move the control surfaces and to eventually even fire small rockets in a losing
effort to gain control of the yawing motion of Columbia.
Final bits of data from
the spacecraft showed that "we were beginning to lose the battle," he
said.
For this reason, Dittemore
said his team is intensifying efforts to recover a final 32 seconds of data
from the spacecraft.
This data, the very last
signals from the dying Columbia, was not processed at Mission Control because the quality of the
electronic signals was too poor to be considered reliable.
But Dittemore said the
signals are being extracted from computers and will be examined to find clues
to why Columbia's left wing was encountering so much drag.
"Perhaps the 32
seconds will help us understand," he said.
So far, no significant
pieces of shuttle wreckage — "red-tag items" — have been
found, Dittemore said. Searchers have discovered, however, a large portion of
the nose cone as well as at least two possible wing sections.
Any pieces of Columbia found in California would be "very,
very significant," Dittemore said, because it would indicate that the
shuttle was falling apart long before its final breakup over Texas.
___
On the Net:
NASA: http://spaceflight.nasa.gov